AI Governance Library

Why invest in AI ethics and governance?

Organizations that measure the value of AI ethics could be a step ahead. Our holistic AI ethics framework considers three types of ROI.
Why invest in AI ethics and governance?

⚡ Quick Summary

This report lays out a compelling, ROI-based case for investing in AI ethics and governance. IBM and Notre Dame offer a structured framework—validated through interviews with 30+ organizations—that reframes AI ethics from cost center to value creator. It presents three distinct forms of return: tangible (economic), intangible (reputation), and long-term (capabilities). Illustrated by real company cases from Deutsche Telekom, SAS, Fidelity, and others, this guide arms leaders with a business-language playbook to win internal buy-in for ethical AI initiatives.

🧩 What’s Covered

1. A Holistic ROI Framework for AI Ethics

IBM identifies three categories of return from AI ethics investments:

  • Economic Impact (Tangible ROI): Avoided fines, reduced legal costs, cost-effective compliance
  • Reputational Impact (Intangible ROI): Brand trust, stakeholder confidence, ESG performance
  • Capabilities (Real Options ROI): Internal governance maturity, reusability, scalable infrastructure 

2. Two Justification Pathways

  • Loss Aversion: AI ethics to avoid fines, PR crises, and lost trust. Short-term, defensive, and regulatory-driven
  • Value Generation: Ethics as a lever for innovation, market differentiation, and long-term growth

3. Action Guide (5-Step Model)

  • Educate C-suite on tangible and intangible ROI
  • Identify AI use cases that align with ethics-driven differentiation
  • Map stakeholder impacts using metrics (e.g. brand lift, retention, revenue)
  • Build ethics-ready infrastructure and implementation strategy
  • Turn ethics into a competitive edge—even in compliance-saturated markets 

4. Real-World Case Studies

  • Deutsche Telekom: Internal AI ethics board aligned with EU AI Act compliance; workshops boost innovation and trust
  • Fidelity Investments: AI Center of Excellence centralizes governance; ethics embedded in every AI project phase
  • SAS: Established a “Data Ethics Practice” with the principle: “Do no harm.” Offers advisory and tooling to clients
  • Global Financial Services Firm: Ethics reviews uncover biased features in credit scoring; reputational risk seen as ROI
  • Health & Consumer Goods Retailer: Combines vendor audits, AI ethics engine, and human-AI teamwork in service ops 

5. Embedded Research References

  • Draws from IBM’s own CxO studies and California Management Review
  • Cites OECD, EU AI Act, and GPT governance debates
  • Builds on prior IBM reports (AI Ethics in ActionEnterprise Guide to AI Governance)

💡 Why it matters?

This is one of the most strategic and decision-maker-friendly frameworks for arguing the business case behind AI ethics. Where many ethics papers are theoretical, IBM anchors its framework in stakeholder value and enterprise incentives. It’s especially powerful for governance leads trying to unlock budget or support from skeptical executives—and for companies looking to align ethical rigor with bottom-line performance.

❓ What’s Missing

  • The framework is rich in theory and case vignettes but lacks tooling: no checklists, dashboards, or KPIs for measurement
  • Limited regional diversity—focus is Western corporate and regulatory context
  • Doesn’t address ethics trade-offs in frontier AI or agentic systems
  • Underplays resistance from teams worried about velocity or feature delays

👥 Best For

  • Chief Ethics or Privacy Officers building org-wide governance strategy
  • Compliance leaders who need to argue for ethics as a source of savings
  • Product owners and PMOs struggling to balance velocity with risk
  • Board members and general counsel vetting investment in responsible AI
  • Strategy consultants creating investment roadmaps or AI governance audits

📄 Source Details

  • TitleWhy Invest in AI Ethics and Governance? Five Real-World Origin Stories
  • Authors: IBM Institute for Business Value in collaboration with the Notre Dame—IBM Tech Ethics Lab
  • Contributors: Francesca Rossi, Brian Goehring, Heather Domin, Marianna Ganapini, Nicholas Berente
  • Date: December 2024
  • Length: 24 pages
  • Format: Strategic report with frameworks, interview data, and ROI illustrations
  • Linkhttps://ibm.com/ibv

📝 Thanks to IBM and the Notre Dame Tech Ethics Lab for reframing AI ethics not as a luxury—but as a multiplier of organizational value.

About the author
Jakub Szarmach

AI Governance Library

Curated Library of AI Governance Resources

AI Governance Library

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to AI Governance Library.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.