AI Governance Library

The Agentic Oversight Framework

The Agentic Oversight Framework ensures agents are contained and embedded into a secure environment that meets institutional requirements for data handling, oversight, and auditability.
The Agentic Oversight Framework

⚡ Quick Summary

This whitepaper introduces the Agentic Oversight Framework (AOF), a structured methodology for deploying AI agents in regulated financial services—especially in BSA/AML workflows. Designed to maximize productivity while maintaining human accountability, the AOF blends secure integration, human-in-the-loop review, auditability, and explainability. Backed by production data from real-world deployments, it offers an actionable blueprint for scaling agentic AI safely and responsibly across compliance operations.

🧩 What’s Covered

1. What Is Agentic AI?

The paper defines AI agents as systems capable of adaptive, goal-directed behavior with limited human input. These agents differ from traditional models (rules-based, ML, or RPA) by combining reasoning, context awareness, and persistence.

2. Architecture of the AOF

The framework includes six pillars:

  • Automated Resolution Pathways (ARPs): Agents follow pre-defined logic derived from SOPs.
  • Data Collection & Validation: Context-rich inputs fuel decision-making (e.g. KYC documents, sanctions data, device metadata).
  • Human Oversight: Every agent decision is reviewed by compliance staff, enabling a “four eyes” control model.
  • Auditability: Logs all interactions, datasets used, and decision paths with human reviewer records.
  • Governance Fit: Aligns with the institution’s Group Risk and Control model across three lines of defense.
  • Explainability Tools: Includes feature attribution, counterfactuals, rationale generation, and visual decision tracing .

3. Business Benefits

  • Reduced false positives (from >95% to <10%)
  • KYC backlog cut from 14 hours to 41 minutes
  • Time-to-onboard dropped from 20 days to ~2 minutes
  • Up to 49% faster time-to-revenue for new clients
  • 2–4× increase in capacity to detect financial crime 

4. Practical Case Studies

  • Fintech Card Program: Agent achieved 100% precision on approved and 90% on declined onboardings.
  • Digital Asset Platform: Cut sanctions review time from 5–20 minutes to ~30 seconds; handled twice the alert volume.
  • Sanctions/PEP Alerts: AI navigated 60+ matches to isolate valid hits, auto-suggesting escalation or clearance with explainability.

5. Implementation Playbook

  • Start in copilot mode, with agents offering recommendations
  • Once trust is earned, move to auto-decisioning for low-risk tasks
  • Use prompt engineering to encode SOPs, and shadow-test agents before production
  • Incorporate continuous feedback, versioning, and drift detection mechanisms
  • Extend the AOF beyond KYC to adverse media checks, fraud reviews, CTRs/SARs, and customer complaints 

💡 Why it matters?

Financial services face crushing compliance burdens with limited staffing. The AOF shows how AI agents can be deployed in a controlled, auditable way without compromising regulatory obligations. It bridges innovation with supervision, giving risk-averse institutions a governance-first path to AI adoption. Given SR 11-7 and OCC/Fed scrutiny, the framework answers the industry’s call for explainability, transparency, and defensible automation.

❓ What’s Missing

  • No direct references to alignment with the EU AI Act or ISO 42001—its applicability is U.S.-centric
  • Lacks open-source tools, templates, or evaluation frameworks for DIY implementation
  • Presumes high data readiness and LLM maturity; little support for small or mid-sized institutions
  • Although human-in-the-loop is central, ethical risks of agent misuse or hallucinations are lightly addressed and may need stronger controls for high-stakes decisions 

👥 Best For

  • Financial institutions deploying AI for compliance, especially KYC and AML
  • AI governance teams aligning LLM-powered tools with risk frameworks
  • Model validation officers navigating SR 11-7, ECOA, and BSA/AML obligations
  • Fintech platforms seeking to scale onboarding without sacrificing oversight
  • Regulators and auditors interested in agent accountability and lifecycle monitoring

📄 Source Details

  • TitleThe Agentic Oversight Framework
  • Authors: Simon Taylor, Soups Ranjan, Matt Vega, Ryan McCormack, Erich Reich
  • Publisher: Sardine (2025)
  • Length: 31 pages
  • Use Case: Real-world deployments with anonymized metrics
  • License: Open-access whitepaper
  • Reviewed By: David Silverman, Head of US Compliance Programs, CIBC

📝 Thanks to Sardine and the authors for opening up the internal machinery behind agentic compliance workflows and offering a concrete path toward accountable AI deployment in high-stakes environments.

About the author
Jakub Szarmach

AI Governance Library

Curated Library of AI Governance Resources

AI Governance Library

Great! You’ve successfully signed up.

Welcome back! You've successfully signed in.

You've successfully subscribed to AI Governance Library.

Success! Check your email for magic link to sign-in.

Success! Your billing info has been updated.

Your billing was not updated.