EU AI Act – Deployer Only Certification Scheme v1.5
A draft certification scheme aimed at AI deployers under the EU AI Act, defining mandatory and optional controls across organizational and technical dimensions, with clear mappings to Article 24.
Every reviewed AI governance resource in one place — reports, standards, guidance and regulation.
A draft certification scheme aimed at AI deployers under the EU AI Act, defining mandatory and optional controls across organizational and technical dimensions, with clear mappings to Article 24.
This handbook is designed to help organizations implement the EU AI Act, offering practical compliance checklists, simplified risk categorization tools, and implementation guides aligned with regulatory articles.
This UNDP flagship report explores how AI is reshaping core government functions — from social protection to justice — and what it takes to ensure this transformation is equitable, ethical, and effective.
An updated glossary from the IAPP defining key technical and policy terms essential to the evolving field of AI governance, designed for professionals across legal, technical, and regulatory domains.
This Microsoft white paper draws on eight safety-critical domains to develop insights for advancing the evaluation and testing ecosystem for AI, especially generative AI.
Autonomy is a double-edged sword for AI agents, unlocking transformative potential while raising critical risks. This paper introduces five levels of autonomy based on user roles: operator, collaborator, consultant, approver, and observer.
Internal AI systems often have dual-use capabilities significantly ahead of the public frontier … which may soon significantly enhance threat actors’ ability to cause harm.
This evidence scan identifies 11 recent frameworks that connect AI safety and traditional risk management, offering insights into how these historically separate fields can inform each other.
A certification framework to assess and assure the responsible governance of AAA (Artificial Intelligence, Algorithmic, Autonomous) systems in financial institutions, aligned with BASEL III, SR11-7, and modern AI regulations.
A practical and research-backed guide offering 10 actionable plays to help product managers and business leaders use generative AI responsibly—grounded in governance, risk mitigation, and business alignment.
China’s AI safety governance is evolving from ethics-focused soft law to increasingly concrete policies on frontier AI risks, though with limited regulatory enforcement mechanisms.
This RAND report outlines policy and technical recommendations for responding to advanced AI systems that act in uncontrollable, harmful ways—so-called Loss of Control (LOC) incidents—emphasizing detection, escalation, and containment.
If a system fails even one, it’s structurally out of compliance and regulators can prove it – in minutes.
An analysis of nearly 460,000 AI model cards shows developers overwhelmingly report technical risks—while real-world harms arise more from misuse and misinformation.
Despite $30–40B invested in GenAI, 95% of businesses see no ROI. The divide is not in adoption—but in impact. This report maps the real reasons behind failure and what separates top performers from stalled efforts.
This roadmap sets out our ambitions for the third-party assurance market in the UK and the immediate actions that government will take to support this emerging sector.
This RAND working paper proposes a framework for identifying tasks that even Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) would be fundamentally unable to perform, grounded in constraints from physics, information theory, and computational complexity.
An interdisciplinary legal-philosophical textbook covering AI’s ethical foundations, regulatory implications, and governance challenges through technical, philosophical, and legal lenses.
Organizations with a Chief AI Officer (CAIO) see 10% higher ROI on AI—and up to 36% more when using centralized operating models. But only 1 in 4 organizations have a CAIO today.
A foundational governance model for AI systems that act autonomously, delegate tasks, or interface with external tools—built to handle autonomy, unpredictability, and systemic risk.
A protocol to connect AI models with external tools and data sources through a shared interface, solving the M×N integration problem for developers.
A modular toolkit for lawmakers, researchers, and advocates to shape effective, rights-respecting AI policy—built on global principles, practical levers, and tested language from 40+ jurisdictions.
A policy-first toolkit for identifying and mitigating overlooked or under-prioritized AI risks—especially those affecting marginalized groups, low-visibility use cases, and long-term governance gaps.
Culture is governance’s invisible backbone. This framework helps leaders identify, assess, and embed cultural levers—from values to incentives—that shape responsible AI behavior across organizations.
Curated Library of AI Governance Resources